Deb’s: Good Stuff, Bad Stuff blog
Purpose: To rate consumer goods from the perspective of a Naturopath, humanitarian, and lover of fine things and to share my opinion with anyone who will listen.
Methodology: one to five points is awarded for each category and -1 point for unacceptable performance. 40 points possible. 20 or below = Bad Stuff 21-40=Good Stuff. Pretty simple.
Bonus score to give credit for the unusual or unique aspect that should not be overlooked.
Bonus score to give credit for the unusual or unique aspect that should not be overlooked.
Food/Restaurant | Product | Service | Activity |
Overall enjoyment | Overall enjoyment | Overall enjoyment | Overall enjoyment |
Taste | Functionality/Efficacy | Staff | Staff |
Packaging/ presentation | Packaging | Credibility | Safety |
Convenience (packaged food) or Service (Restaurants) | Convenience | Atmosphere | Location |
Value | Value | Value | Value |
Environmental Consideration | Environmental Consideration | Environmental Consideration | Environmental Consideration |
Bonus: | Bonus: | Bonus: | Bonus: |
Social Responsibility* | Social Responsibility* | Social Responsibility* | Social Responsibility* |
Customer Service | Customer Service | Customer Service | Customer Service |
Ethics* | Ethics* | Ethics* | Ethics* |
Return Policy* | Return Policy* | Refund Policy* | Refund Policy* |
Categories: Food, Products, Services, Activities
Rationale: All categories get a point value 1-5
5 points = the best ever, my favorite, I reserve this for things that knock my socks off. I will yell from the rooftops how great this is!
4 points = highly pleased, very satisfied, worth recommending
3 points = pleased, but barely above average
2 points = hardly worth mention, I’ll likely forget it within a few days.
1 point = offensive, I would recommend against it. What were you thinking?
-1 "Penalty" point for unacceptable performance or circumstances
*assume a zero (met expectations) but negative points for poor experience
